Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of NICFA claim because plaintiff failed to identify the speaker of the alleged misleading statements or facts
• dismissing CFA claim under Rule 9(b) where plaintiff failed to identify the speaker of allegedly misleading statements or otherwise allege facts sufficient to support claim
• dismissing plaintiff’s NJCFA and common law fraud claims under Rule 9(b) where plaintiff failed to identify the speaker of the allegedly misleading statements and otherwise allege facts to support plaintiff’s charges
• allowing permissive joinder of additional defendants by counter-claim plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).