· 11/13/1995
Hall v. Burger King Corp.
Citations
- 912 F. Supp. 1509
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20589
- 1995 WL 762146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Hall had no claim against Burger King because Burger King itself was “the source of the business opportunity [it] allegedly interfered with”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kehoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.