Hugh STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining we will not consider an issue the Social Security claimant failed to raise and preserve in the district court
• “As a general principle, this court will not address an argument that has not been raised in the district court.”
• “As a general principle, this court will not address an argument that has not been raised in the district court.”
• “As a general principle, this court will not ad- dress an argument that has not been raised in the district court.”
• “Judicial economy is served and prejudice is avoided by binding the parties to the facts presented and theories argued below.” (in- ternal quotation marks omitted)
• “As a general principle, this court will not address an argument that has not been raised in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).