Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 3/6/2012

Solutia, Inc. v. McWane, Inc.

Citations

  • 672 F.3d 1230
  • 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20062
  • 2012 WL 695007
  • 74 ERC (BNA) 1225
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “holding that a PRP could not assert a § [9607(a)] claim if it possessed a § [9613(f)(3)(B)] contribution claim”
  • seeking to recover costs that plaintiffs incurred pursuant to consent decrees that were executed subsequent to a civil action commenced against them
  • “grounds alleged in the complaint but not relied upon in summary judgment are deemed abandoned” (quotation omitted)
  • “[G]rounds alleged in the complaint but not relied upon in summary judgment are deemed abandoned.”
  • “There is no burden upon the district court to distill every potential argument that could be made based on the material before it on summary judgment. Rather, the onus is upon the parties to formulate arguments.”
  • “There is no burden upon the district court to distill every potential argument that could be made based on the materials before it . . . .” (quoting Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Dunmar Corp., 43 F.3d 587, 599 (11th Cir. 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Hill, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Solutia, Inc. v. McWane, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.