Skip to main content

Resha v. Tucker

Citations

  • 670 So. 2d 56
  • 1996 WL 15527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a constitutional violation by a state official acting outside the scope of her official duties did not give rise to an action for money damages under the specific facts of the case
  • \The language of th[e] constitutional provision clearly provides that it applies only to government action.\
  • “The language of th[e] constitutional provision clearly provides that it applies only to government action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Resha v. Tucker

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.