Rice v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the 1979 amendments to section 768.28(9) eliminated the inconsistency in the statute that was the basis for the court’s decision in Talmadge
• suggesting that the 1979 amendments to section 768.28(9) eliminated the inconsistency in the statute that was the basis for the court's decision in Talmadge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-08-17· cited 86×
• Resha v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-18· cited 19×
• Comuntzis v. Pinellas County School Bd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-05· cited 14×
• Middlebrooks v. DEPT. OF STATE, DIV. OF LICENSING
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-07· cited 8×
• Keck v. Eminisor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-25· cited 5×
• City of North Bay Village v. Braelow
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-26· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rupp v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 132×
• State, Dept. of Transp. v. Knowles
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-25· cited 43×
• DISTRICT SCH. BD. OF LAKE CTY. v. Talmadge
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-02-14· cited 36×
• Kirkland Ex Rel. Kirkland v. State, Dept. of Hlt. Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-04· cited 9×
• Talmadge v. District School Bd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-01· cited 6×
• Stillwell v. Thigpen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-14· cited 4×