Skip to main content

Tucker v. Resha

Citations

  • 634 So. 2d 756
  • 1994 WL 101091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is “clear that article I, section 23 does not create a cause of action for ‘governmental intrusion’ because legislative enactment is needed to delineate whether immunity is waived to permit the award of money damages”
  • finding no legislative waiver of sovereign immunity as to the privacy provision of the Florida Constitution and therefore concluding that money damages are not available for violations of that right
  • finding no legislative waiver of sovereign immunity as to the privacy provision of the Florida Constitution and therefore concluding that money damages are not available for violations of that right
  • absolute privilege necessary to allow executive offices to perform their duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.