· 11/5/1991
Hafer v. Melo
Citations
- 502 U.S. 21
- 112 S. Ct. 358
- 116 L. Ed. 2d 301
- 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6502
- 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,059
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant official acting in his official capacity receives the same immunity as the government agency to which he belongs
- holding that the Eleventh Amendment provides no shield for a state official confronted by a claim that he deprived another of a federal right
- holding that state officers “sued in their personal capacity ... fit comfortably within the statutory term ‘person.’ ”
- holding that suits against state officials in their official capacities are suits against the state
- holding that suits against state officials in their official capacities are suits against the state
- holding that individual capacity suit against Auditor General of Pennsylvania was not barred by Eleventh Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.