Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/5/1991

Hafer v. Melo

Citations

  • 502 U.S. 21
  • 112 S. Ct. 358
  • 116 L. Ed. 2d 301
  • 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6502
  • 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant official acting in his official capacity receives the same immunity as the government agency to which he belongs
  • holding that the Eleventh Amendment provides no shield for a state official confronted by a claim that he deprived another of a federal right
  • holding that state officers “sued in their personal capacity ... fit comfortably within the statutory term ‘person.’ ”
  • holding that suits against state officials in their official capacities are suits against the state
  • holding that suits against state officials in their official capacities are suits against the state
  • holding that individual capacity suit against Auditor General of Pennsylvania was not barred by Eleventh Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,324 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hafer v. Melo

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.