Renbaum v. Custom Holding, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion to alter or amend judgment based on a consideration of additional admissible evidence
• “[t]he responding party must have an opportunity to address the merits of the Rule 2-534 motion (and the request to receive additional evidence)”
• “Decisions on matters of law are reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).