Tydings v. Berk Enterprises

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Representation of a corporation as an entity and the majority of its directors, individually, creates a possible conflict of interest for the attorney, particularly where the corporation’s interests are adverse to those of the directors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Post v. Bregman
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-15· cited 84×
• In Re Oracle Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 1993-08-09· cited 32×
• Renbaum v. Custom Holding, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-04· cited 24×
• Hicks v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 20×
• Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. Weinberg & Green
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-06· cited 16×
• Hallock v. Key Federal Savings Bank (In Re Silver Oak Homes, Ltd.)
  D. Maryland· 1994-04-14· cited 9×
• Bontempo v. Lare
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-04-30· cited 9×
• Campellone v. Cragan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 2×
• In re Brennan
  D. Maryland· 1992-02-12
• Haleck v. TRT, Inc.
  High Court of American Samoa· 2003-06-27