Skip to main content
· 5/29/1984

Gabelli & Co. v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 479 A.2d 276
  • 1984 Del. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the application of the business-judgment rule because minority stockholders failed to demonstrate such “self-dealing” or “detriment” as to warrant application of “intrinsic fairness test”
  • Dividends may not be withheld as a result of “fraud or-gross abuse of discretion’’
  • Dividends may not be withheld as a result of “fraud or gross abuse of discretion”
  • Dividends may not be withheld as a result of “fraud or gross abuse of discretion”
  • “It is settled law in [Delaware] that the declaration and payment of a dividend rests in the discretion of the corporation’s board of directors in the exercise of its business judgment[.]”
  • equitable action to compel payment of dividend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Moore, Christie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.