Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/30/2015
Schlotzhauer v. Morton
Citations
- 224 Md. App. 72
- 119 A.3d 121
- 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ʻIn general, the denial of a motion to alter or amend a judgment is reviewed by appellate courts for abuse of discretion.’ RRC Northeast, LLC v. BAA Maryland, Inc., 413 Md. 638, 673, 994 A.2d 430 (2010) (citing Wilson–X v. Dep’t of Human Res., 403 Md. 667, 674–75, 944 A.2d 509 (2008)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meredith, Arthur, Leahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Amer. Radiology v. ReissCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-24· cited 21×
- Morton v. SchlotzhauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-19· cited 14×
- Sydnor v. HathawayCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-27· cited 2×
- Reiss v. American RadiologyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-26· cited 1×
- Breona C. v. Rodney D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-19
- Linz v. Montgomery Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-11-01
- Halstad v. HalstadCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-29
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schwab v. ReillySupreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 289×
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court· 1922-12-04· cited 245×
- RRC Northeast, LLC v. BAA Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-10· cited 191×
- Henry Clay Tignor v. William C. Parkinson, Jr., in Re Henry Clay Tignor, DebtorFourth Circuit· 1984-03-15· cited 134×
- Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-07· cited 88×
- Adams v. ManownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-11-23· cited 83×
- Crowe v. HouseworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-30· cited 76×
- In Re Joseph A. Thompson, Debtor. Joseph A. Thompson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1994-02-01· cited 52×
- Arrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-17· cited 49×
- Wilson-X v. Department of Human Resources Ex Rel. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-14· cited 46×
- Frederico Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd. And Djakarta Lloyd, P.N.Second Circuit· 1980-03-19· cited 40×
- Barletta v. TedeschiN.D. New York· 1990-12-03· cited 37×
- Lowman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-06-09· cited 34×
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-04· cited 34×
- Winmark Ltd. Partnership v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-09· cited 31×
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-22· cited 30×
- Pacific Mortgage and Investment Group, Ltd. v. HornCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-01· cited 29×
- In Re OBrienW.D. Michigan· 2011-01-04· cited 29×
- Maryland Board of Nursing v. NechayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-15· cited 28×
- Renbaum v. Custom Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-04· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.