Flanders Jordan v. Eugene S. Lefevre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We decline Jordan’s invitation to rule that the passage of nine years 10 makes reconstruction of the record [for a Batson challenge] infeasible as a matter 11 of law . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).