Stein v. Stein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we cannot “infer additional findings necessary to sustain the award” where one party requested Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 82 findings the court did not make
• noting Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 52 is the civil counterpart to Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 82
• If a party makes a Rule 82(a) request, “[i]t must be clear from the family court’s findings how the court arrived at its mathematical figure.” (citation omitted)
• “One of the purposes of Rule 82(A) is to give the appellate courts the ability to examine the basis for a mathematical figure awarded as child support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Logan B. v. Dcs
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-24· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ritchie v. Krasner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-21· cited 173×
• Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-07-24· cited 102×
• Kelsey v. Kelsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-09· cited 68×
• Urban Development Company v. Dekreon
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-09-13· cited 34×
• Hetherington v. Hetherington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-06-19· cited 30×
• Reed v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-06-25· cited 12×