Gilliland v. Rodriquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) requires the court to find only the ultimate facts, not the evidentiary facts upon which the ultimate facts are based
• “The ultimate test of the adequacy thereof is whether they are pertinent to the issues and comprehensive enough to provide a basis for the decision.”
• “A court is called upon to make findings of only ultimate facts and is not required to bolster them by subsidiary findings on evidentiary matters upon which such ultimate facts are based----”
• “It is unnecessary for the court to make findings on undisputed matters.”
• unnecessary to make findings on undisputed matters
• unnecessary to make findings on undisputed matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).