Arizona Supreme Court· 3/22/1954
Gilliland v. Rodriquez
Citations
- 268 P.2d 334
- 77 Ariz. 163
- 1954 Ariz. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) requires the court to find only the ultimate facts, not the evidentiary facts upon which the ultimate facts are based
- “The ultimate test of the adequacy thereof is whether they are pertinent to the issues and comprehensive enough to provide a basis for the decision.”
- “A court is called upon to make findings of only ultimate facts and is not required to bolster them by subsidiary findings on evidentiary matters upon which such ultimate facts are based----”
- “It is unnecessary for the court to make findings on undisputed matters.”
- unnecessary to make findings on undisputed matters
- unnecessary to make findings on undisputed matters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Windes, Phelps, Stanford, Prade, Udall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-20· cited 147×
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-07-31· cited 103×
- Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court· 1963-10-30· cited 68×
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court· 1973-03-22· cited 63×
- In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 62×
- Marriage of Breitbart-Napp v. NappCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-05-24· cited 41×
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-12-29· cited 35×
- Elson Development Co. v. Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1965-11-18· cited 32×
- Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY.Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 30×
- McDowell Mountain Ranch Land Coalition v. VizcainoArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-18· cited 28×
- Starkovich v. NoyeArizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-13· cited 24×
- Meyer v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court· 1968-12-06· cited 23×
- Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass'n v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-24· cited 23×
- Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-08· cited 21×
- Ellingson v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-09-13· cited 16×
- Miller v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 14×
- Kitchell Corporation v. HermansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-11-12· cited 13×
- Dooling v. CaseyMontana Supreme Court· 1968-12-18· cited 12×
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-06-25· cited 12×
- Picture Rocks Fire District v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-18· cited 11×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationThird Circuit· 1946-05-28· cited 121×
- Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.D.C. Circuit· 1944-03-31· cited 75×
- Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court· 1952-05-26· cited 48×
- Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court· 1954-03-01· cited 39×
- Underwriters Salvage Co. Of New York v. Davis & Shaw Furniture Co.Tenth Circuit· 1952-08-12· cited 27×
- Fontes v. PorterNinth Circuit· 1946-07-29· cited 19×
- McGee v. NeeEighth Circuit· 1940-07-22· cited 17×
- Drumm v. SimerArizona Supreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 13×
- United Verde Copper Co. v. RalstonNinth Circuit· 1931-01-12· cited 12×
- Curtis v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1904-03-20· cited 12×
- Sharp v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-01-12· cited 10×
- Kennedy v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1940-12-20· cited 9×
- Carroll v. HarrisonW.D. Virginia· 1943-03-24· cited 6×
- Shapiro v. Yellow Cab Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1948-01-30· cited 3×
- Carl v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court· 1943-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.