Skip to main content
· 4/14/2003

Redwend Ltd. Partnership v. Edwards

Citations

  • 581 S.E.2d 496
  • 354 S.C. 459
  • 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a non-reliance clause disclaims against representations made by either party which were not provided for in the agreement
  • stating the elements for negligent misrepresentation: “(1) the defendant made a false representation to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant had a pecuniary interest in making the statement; (3
  • finding a non-reliance clause defeats a claim for negligent misrepresentation if the clause (1) uses the terms \rely\ or \reliance\ and (2) is set apart from the merger clause
  • “The parol evidence rule prevents the introduction of extrinsic evidence of agreements or understandings contemporaneous with or prior to execution of a written instrument when the extrinsic evidence is to be used to contradict, vary, or explain the written instrument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Huff, Morehead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.