· 9/26/2005
Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. Kunze
Citations
- 623 S.E.2d 107
- 366 S.C. 583
- 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the nonexistence of a private remedy under the statute prohibited the third-party beneficiary claim
- holding a plaintiff may not change the theory of recovery, and that an issue must first be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be subject to appellate review
- finding a party may not argue one theory before the trial court and another on appeal
- stating a party may not argue one theory before the trial court and another on appeal
- \[A]n unfair trade practices claim may not be brought in a representative capacity.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Huff, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.