Skip to main content
· 9/26/2005

Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. Kunze

Citations

  • 623 S.E.2d 107
  • 366 S.C. 583
  • 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the nonexistence of a private remedy under the statute prohibited the third-party beneficiary claim
  • holding a plaintiff may not change the theory of recovery, and that an issue must first be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be subject to appellate review
  • finding a party may not argue one theory before the trial court and another on appeal
  • stating a party may not argue one theory before the trial court and another on appeal
  • \[A]n unfair trade practices claim may not be brought in a representative capacity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Huff, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.