Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/28/2004

Moore v. Moore

Citations

  • 599 S.E.2d 467
  • 360 S.C. 241
  • 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding one of the most important tests regarding the existence of a partnership is the intention of the parties
  • holding factors to consider when determining whether a partnership exists include: (1) the sharing of profits and losses; (2) the community of interest in capital or property; and (3) the community of interest in control and management
  • upholding the rule “defendants have the burden of proving a plaintiff’s damages could have been avoided, reduced, or minimized.”
  • stating the party who claims damages should have been minimized has the burden of proving they could reasonably have been avoided or reduced
  • \[T]he admission of evidence is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.\
  • \[T]his court will not disturb a trial court's evidentiary rulings absent a clear abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Huff, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.