Bayle v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment because the record did not demonstrate that further discovery was necessary
• stating that the discovery rule does not \require absolute certainty a cause of action exists before the statute of limitations begins to run\
• holding the date of “loss” for purposes of the Act was the date on which the plaintiff knew of the injury
• holding the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment without allowing for additional discovery where no further discovery would have contributed to the resolution of the case
• stating the trial court’s rulings in matters involving discovery will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion
• stating the trial court’s rulings in matters involving discovery will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).