Skip to main content
· 12/22/2003

Schmidt v. Courtney

Citations

  • 592 S.E.2d 326
  • 357 S.C. 310
  • 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed most strongly against the moving party
  • stating that all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed strongly against the moving party
  • requiring the nonmoving party to \come forward with specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial\
  • stating all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed most strongly against the moving party
  • stating all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed most strongly against the moving party
  • stating all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed most strongly against the moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Cureton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.