Redmond v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where police intentionally misrepresented their purpose to gain entry to a house by consent, the search was invalid for two reasons: (1) the consent was involuntary; and (2
• holding that, where police intentionally misrepresented their purpose to gain entry to a house by consent, the search was invalid for two reasons: (1) the consent was involuntary; and (2
• holding that, where police intentionally misrepresented their purpose to gain entry to a house by consent, the search was invalid for two reasons: (1) the consent was involuntary; and (2) the scope of consent was limited by the officers' misrepresented purpose to gain entry
• holding that, where police intentionally misrepresented their purpose to gain entry to a house by consent, the search was invalid for two reasons: (1) the consent was involuntary; and (2) the scope of consent was limited by the officers’ misrepresented purpose to gain entry
• “[Vacating the monetary award] necessitates vacation of the alimony as well, since any significant change in the monetary award will require the court to reassess its alimony award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Andrews
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-30· cited 36×
• Varriale v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-11· cited 17×
• Goshorn v. Goshorn
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-19· cited 7×
• Glanden v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-02-05· cited 1×

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• Brigham City v. Stuart
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
• Hoffa v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
• United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
• Murray v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,424×
• United States v. Hardin
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-25· cited 130×
• Wilkes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-25· cited 104×
• United States v. Johnny Bob Robertson
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-09-12· cited 96×
• United States v. Jose Gerardo Mendoza-Gonzalez
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-01-10· cited 96×
• Wengert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-16· cited 75×
• Perkins v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-06· cited 73×
• Bailey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-14· cited 71×
• Nathan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-29· cited 70×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-11· cited 69×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-19· cited 55×
• Cox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-20· cited 52×
• Myers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 45×