District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/13/2006
Hill v. State
Citations
- 933 So. 2d 667
- 2006 WL 1910174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the state is not entitled to present evidence that a defendant has committed an unrelated crime merely because the defendant’s testimony can be characterized as false or misleading”
- “A suggestion or insinuation made in the defense case cannot be used as a pretext to inform the jury that he has been convicted of a crime before.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Padovano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 250×
- Czubak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 132×
- McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 101×
- Bozeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-03· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.