Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 933 So. 2d 667
  • 2006 WL 1910174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the state is not entitled to present evidence that a defendant has committed an unrelated crime merely because the defendant’s testimony can be characterized as false or misleading”
  • “A suggestion or insinuation made in the defense case cannot be used as a pretext to inform the jury that he has been convicted of a crime before.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.