Rawlings v. D. M. Oliver, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs right to use product-line exception against successor manufacturer was unaffected by fact that claimant’s injuries occurred three months before successor manufacturer’s purchase of enterprise
• holding that plaintiff's right to use product-line exception against successor manufacturer was unaffected by fact that claimant's injuries occurred three months before successor manufacturer's purchase of enterprise
• holding that the fact that a product was not mass produced has no effect on the manufacturer’s responsibilities in manufacturing and selling products
• imposing liability under Ray although the successor did not manufacture the identical product line
• a contractor performing in accordance with the plans and specifications of the owner may be liable for a defect in the plans if the defect should have been obvious to a licensed contractor
• manufacturer that produced nine specially-ordered kelpdrying machines strictly liable for defects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).