Skip to main content
· 2/2/1984

Stratton v. Garvey International, Inc.

Citations

  • 676 P.2d 1290
  • 9 Kan. App. 2d 254
  • 1984 Kan. App. LEXIS 294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming judgment for successor because its relationship to its predecessor's customers was too tenuous
  • affirming judgment for successor because its relationship to its predecessor’s customers was too tenuous
  • discusses negligence or strict liability for failure to warn of a dangerous condition in a product
  • “The product line theory is inapplicable in the instant case ... because plaintiff’s remedy against the original installer of the [product] ... has not been destroyed”
  • a majority of courts emphasize “a common identity of officers, directors, and stock between the selling and purchasing corporation as the key element of a ‘continuation’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rees, Meyer, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.