Clarence Tucker, Jr. And Jean Tucker v. Paxson MacHine Company, William Thropp & Sons Company, Division of J.M.L. Trading Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s conclusion that a de facto merger did not exist because the predecessor continued to exist after the sale
• in diversity case under Missouri law, rejecting plaintiff's argument for adoption in federal court of expanded strict products liability doctrine under state law, on ground that the trend was not well established
• under Missouri law no sufficient reason to depart from traditional rule of non-liability
• declining to recognize product line liability theory under Wisconsin law
• finding no liability under similar facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).