Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/2/2008
Schmidt v. Boardman Co.
Citations
- 958 A.2d 498
- 2008 Pa. Super. 203
- 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he only stated mandatory requirements of the product-line exception in Pennsylvania [are] the three Ray factors[.]”
- bystanders who witnessed relatives killed and/or injured by defective product allowed to recover under Section 402A for emotional distress even though they suffered no physical injuries
- judgment notwithstanding the verdict denied on same product line element to defendant successor corporation that produced “fire wagons” with alterations as compared to the injury causing fire truck
- bystanders who witnessed relatives killed and/or injured by [a] defective [fire hose] allowed to recover under [Second Restatement] Section 402A for emotional distress even though they suffered no physical injuries
- adopting the trial court's reasoning as its own
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Bender, Files, Melvin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-04-21· cited 137×
- Passarello v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-07· cited 69×
- Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-24· cited 59×
- Blumer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-06· cited 55×
- Schuenemann v. Dreemz, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-04· cited 54×
- Krepps, F. v. Snyder, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-03-24· cited 48×
- Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-18· cited 43×
- Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-20· cited 34×
- Nazarak, S. v. Waite, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-08-02· cited 27×
- Pringle v. RapaportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-31· cited 26×
- Van Doren v. Coe Press Equipment Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-12-30· cited 9×
- Fizzano Bros. Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-15· cited 9×
- Wiggins v. Synthes (U.S.A.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-08-12· cited 6×
- Berrier v. Simplicity Mfg IncThird Circuit· 2009-04-21
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by PA DEP v. Monsanto Co., Solutia Inc. and Pharmacia LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-12-30
- Kujawski v. FogmegLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-04-15
- Sutch v. Roxborough Memorial HospitalPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-05-15
- Clifton A. Little Ii Et Ano, V. Hardie-tynes Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2025-08-25
- Burnley, D. v. Loews HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-05
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 1,026×
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 513×
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-27· cited 428×
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-11· cited 424×
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 396×
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court· 1964-04-21· cited 384×
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-08-26· cited 264×
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-01-09· cited 260×
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-18· cited 250×
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-20· cited 167×
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-14· cited 166×
- Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-16· cited 134×
- Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-18· cited 120×
- Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-23· cited 107×
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 96×
- Shannon v. Samuel Langston CompanyW.D. Michigan· 1974-05-31· cited 92×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1974-07-18· cited 90×
- American Future System, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Eastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-21· cited 64×
- Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-24· cited 62×
- Continental Insurance v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-17· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.