· 12/22/1995
Railroad Commission v. Torch Operating Co.
Citations
- 912 S.W.2d 790
- 39 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 165
- 1995 Tex. LEXIS 162
- 1995 WL 759197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that “[t]he issue for the reviewing court is not whether the agency reached the correct conclusion”
- explaining that substantial evidence review “is a limited standard of review that gives significant deference to the agency in its field of expertise”
- holding the substantial evidence standard of review “gives significant deference to the agency in its field of expertise.”
- describing substantial evidence standard as “limited” and entitling agency to “significant deference” in its field of expertise
- applying APA’s substantial evidence standard to Commission decision under Texas Natural Resources Code
- applying APA substantial- evidence standard to Commission decision under Texas Natural Resources Code
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spector, Phillips, Gonzalez, Hightower, Hecht, Cornyn, Enoch, Owen, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.