Skip to main content
· 8/26/2005

Granek v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners

Citations

  • 172 S.W.3d 761
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6954
  • 2005 WL 2043816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite offering lengthy explanation for change in penalty, board’s explanation violated section 2001.058(e) where explanation was not supported by Board’s findings and several findings were contradictory to explanation
  • finding that Board’s explanation for rejecting sanction violated section 2001.058(e) where explanation was not supported by Board’s findings and several findings were contradictory to explanation
  • stating that ALJ is sole judge of witness credibility and may accept or reject testimony of any witness
  • finding that Board's explanation for rejecting sanction violated section 2001.058(e) where explanation was not supported by Board's findings and several findings were contradictory to explanation
  • noting that disciplinary recommendation implicated section 2001.058(e) despite that recommendation does not have presumptively binding effect
  • addressing due-process implications of pre-prosecution delays in agency actions and applicable burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices Kidd, B.A. Smith and Pemberton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.