RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXAS v. WBD Oil & Gas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because agency statement “affect[s] all hospitals receiving reimbursement for inpatient Medicaid services,” it is one “of general applicability”
• concluding that “field rules” were not rules of “general applicability” and noting that APA definition of rule “does not reference statements made in determining individual rights”
• concluding that “field rules” were not rules of “general applicability” and noting that APA definition of rule “does not reference statements made in determining individual rights”
• holding no jurisdiction under APA § 2001.038 for claims regarding agency orders adopting field rules, which are not “rules” under the APA
• concluding field rules adopted through contested-case hearings “are not rules of general applicability which must not be made without public comment but are an adjudication of the individual interests principally affected”
• explaining that not all agency statements are rules under APA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).