Montgomery Independent School District v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the Board did not have authority within the statutory scheme of subchapter F” to make additional findings beyond those made by the appointed hearing examiner
• holding that a reviewing court must affirm the decision even if there is “only more than a mere scintilla” of evidence to support the decision
• holding that a reviewing court must affirm the decision even if there is “only more than a mere scintilla” of evidence to support the decision
• concluding that section 21.259(c) of Education Code limited school board’s review of facts “to conducting a substantial evidence review” and noting that “provisions governing the hearing-examiner process in the Education Code impose 23 interpretation of section 2003.047(m
• holding education code did not authorize school board to make additional findings in addition to those made by hearing examiner
• holding education code did not authorize school board to make additional findings in addition to those made by hearing examiner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).