Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the evidence in the record actually may preponderate against the decision of the agency and nonetheless amount to substantial evidence”
• holding that agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it improperly bases its decision on non-statutory criteria
• concluding that ultimate fact findings are “broad postulates” that are “phrased in factual language” but are “easily seen as conclusions relative to legal standards”
• holding that substantial evidence supported an agency’s order despite the fact “that many of the [agency’s] 213 findings . . . [were] improper and irrelevant”
• holding that “the findings, inferences, conclusions, and decisions of an administrative agency are presumed to be supported by substantial evidence, and the burden is on the contestant to prove otherwise”
• stating that burden is on contestant to show agency's decision was not supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).