Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 11/19/1993

Qutb v. Strauss

Citations

  • 11 F.3d 488
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29974
  • 1993 WL 548119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that broad exemptions in ordinance allow parents to make decisions for his or her child in many areas
  • assuming without deciding that minors’ right to freedom of movement is fundamental and therefore applying strict scrutiny
  • treating claim as equal protection claim in light of classification drawn by juvenile curfew ordinance
  • discussing right to freedom of movement as the right is restricted by a curfew ordinance
  • noting that Dallas curfew contains several broad exceptions
  • parties conceded, and the court agreed, that governmental interest in enacting a juvenile curfew ordinance to reduce juvenile crime and victimization, while promoting juvenile safety and well-being, is a compelling interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Qutb v. Strauss

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.