Cornerstone Christian Schools v. University Interscholastic League

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the parental right protects “choices regarding the type of education—e.g., public, private or home-schooling . . . but not particular components of that education, such as participation in interscholastic athletics or enrollment in particular courses”
• reviewing UIL rule to determine whether it violated constitutional rights to free exercise of religion, due process, and equal protection
• reviewing UIL rule 12 to determine whether it violated constitutional rights to free exercise of religion, due process, and equal protection
• association’s rule distinguishing between public and nonpublic schools “bears a rational relationship to the state’s interest in reducing unfair competition”
• addressing constitutional challenges to UIL rule when UIL was party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).