Hutchins, Tiana v. DC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that federal right of parental control in upbringing of children does not extend to parental decisions of when and if children will be on streets, but only encompasses parents' control of home and formal education of children
• stating that the court \need not consider cursory arguments made only in a footnote\
• stating that the court “need not consider cursory arguments made only in a footnote”
• refusing to recognize a general right to free movement based on the right to interstate travel
• describing why these dicta do not sup- port a fundamental right to free movement
• rejecting the assertion that the District of Columbia prove that its curfew resulted in a drop in juvenile arrests when it had relied on evidence from other cities that curfews reduce arrests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).