Treacy v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “taken as a whole, the ordinance is the least restrictive means available to achieve the municipality’s [compelling] interests”
• ruling that juvenile curfew ordinance implicated fundamental rights to move about and to privacy
• deciding facial challenge to constitutionality of municipal curfew on minors; even though minors had been arrested, court evaluated statute on its face without using specific facts of arrests
• deciding facial challenge to constitutionality of municipal curfew on minors; even though minors had been arrested, court evaluated statute on its face without using specific facts of arrests
• noting that United States Supreme Court has “held that the rights of minors are not always coextensive with those of adults”
• applying strict scrutiny but acknowledging that precedents in other jurisdictions point toward intermediate scrutiny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).