Quinton v. States States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the issue of whether the decision of a military correction board was arbitrary or capricious was the type of decision “the court frequently reviews”
• finding the board’s decision arbitrary and capricious when the decision was “internally inconsistent and not supported by the administrative record”
• finding an agency decision arbitrary and capricious when the decision was “not supported by the administrative record”
• implementing correction of military records remedy rather than remanding for BCMR to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).