Quinton v. States States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the issue of whether the decision of a military correction board was arbitrary or capricious was the type of decision “the court frequently reviews”
• finding the board’s decision arbitrary and capricious when the decision was “internally inconsistent and not supported by the administrative record”
• finding an agency decision arbitrary and capricious when the decision was “not supported by the administrative record”
• implementing correction of military records remedy rather than remanding for BCMR to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holt v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-02-18· cited 6×
• Bader v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2022-07-06
• Draper v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2022-11-30

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Baker v. Carr
  Supreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
• Chappell v. Wallace
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,183×
• Gilligan v. Morgan
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 583×
• David W. Heisig v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1983-10-19· cited 462×
• Daniel A. Lindsay v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 428×
• John C. Boyle, Paintiff-Appellant v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 277×
• Victoria M. Voge v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1988-04-19· cited 265×
• James L. Murphy v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1993-07-19· cited 245×
• Kenneth L. Wronke v. John A. Marsh, as Secretary of the Army
  Federal Circuit· 1986-04-04· cited 199×
• Skinner v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-02-21· cited 182×
• Stuart Sargisson v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1990-10-18· cited 161×
• Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc. And Garry Tucker, and Mitsubishi International Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2000-06-13· cited 148×
• Felix E. Perez v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 140×
• Southfork Systems, Inc. v. The United States, and State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Commission for the Blind
  Federal Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 130×
• Gregory C. Porter v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1999-01-20· cited 126×
• Stephen W. Richey v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-11· cited 111×
• Rear Admiral (Lh) Noel K. Dysart, Medical Corps, U.S. Navy (Ret.) v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 86×
• Dorl v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1973-02-16· cited 81×
• Grieg v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1981-01-28· cited 57×