James L. Murphy v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims may decide whether the military followed procedures set forth in its own regulations
• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims may decide whether the military followed procedures set forth in its own regulations
• holding that in reviewing decisions of the military, the “invocation of the rubric ‘injustice’ provides no basis for judicial relief”
• stating that the merits of a military decision to release a servicemember from active duty are beyond judicial reach
• noting that “[j]usticiability is distinct from jurisdiction” and commenting that “[j]usticiability is a particularly apt inquiry when one seeks review of military activities”
• stating that a court may determine whether the procedures followed comport with the statutory or regulatory standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).