Skip to main content
· 5/7/2008

Preston v. Atmel Corp.

Citations

  • 560 F. Supp. 2d 1035
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37521
  • 2008 WL 2001240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an employment- based IIED claim to be inadequately pleaded, where the allegations did not show any “ongoing, suggested threat of unwanted physical or sexual contact”
  • “In short, intentional interference with a prospective business relation requires a showing of intentional and improper interference preventing formation of a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward W. Nottingham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.