Skip to main content
· 4/14/2003

W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. v. Krystkowiak

Citations

  • 66 P.3d 133
  • 2002 WL 31995004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the dismissal of the POME -related motion to dismiss because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted
  • affirming the dismissal of the POME -related motion to dismiss because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted
  • dismissing claim for tortious interference with contract where “[the plaintiff] did not allege that [the defendant] ‘improperly’ interfered with the contract”
  • analyzing sufficiency of complaint for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Ney, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.