Pearson v. Kancilia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient evidence to support an IIED claim, where the plaintiff was pressured into having sex with her employer, who “caused [the plaintiff] to believe that she had no choice in the matter: if she did not comply with his requests, she would lose her job”
• evidence that chiropractor had forced an employee and a patient to have sex with him was sufficient to sustain jury’s finding that chiropractor had engaged in outrageous conduct
• “Mere insults, indignities, [and] threats ... are insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).