Rugg v. McCarty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff stated a claim for invasion of privacy based on allegations that the defendant “harassed her with numerous telephone calls and letters demanding payment”
• recognizing the right to privacy as a theory of tortious conduct but declining to define or categorize all invasions that may constitute a violation of that right
• recognizing the right to privacy as a theory of tortious conduct but declining to define or categorize all invasions that may constitute a violation of that right
• refusing to characterize all invasions that might constitute a violation of the right to privacy
• refusing to characterize all invasions that might constitute a violation of the right to privacy
• harassment via telephone and mail and threats to garnish wages sufficient to support outrageous conduct claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).