Washington Supreme Court· 11/21/2012

State v. Paumier

Citations

176 Wash. 2d 29
288 P.3d 1126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that \RAP 2.5(a) does not apply in its typical manner\
“privately questioning] potential jurors during voir dire without first conducting a Bone-Club analysis ... is structural [error] and warrants a new trial just as it did in Wise”
same; “we are left with no other choice but to order a new trial”
RAP 2.5(a) does not apply in its typical manner where a structural error is involved
\privately question[ing] potential jurors during voir dire without first conducting a Bone-Club analysis ... is structural [error] and warrants a new trial just as it did in Wise\
potential jurors questioned in judge’s chambers, and it was recorded and transcribed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Paumier

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.