Skip to main content

Powell v. Powell

Citations

  • 194 P.3d 364
  • 2008 Alas. LEXIS 143
  • 2008 WL 4531647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 82 when former wife filed Rule 60(b) motion to modify property division
  • finding absence of counsel did not favor relief from property division under Rule 60(b)(6) because party engaged in negotiating agreement after receiving threats of litigation from former spouse
  • “Rule 60(b)(6) ‘really is not meant to apply when you almost make a (b)(3) showing . . . but not quite, and then you say, well, then you should apply (b)(6) for relief.’ ” (omission in original) (quoting the superior court below)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.