Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 60(b)(6) cannot be used “to circumvent the time limit if the circumstances actually amount to a 60(b)(1) claim”
• holding that court-ordered money judgment was not “contracting debt” for purposes of article IX, section 9
• recognizing motion for mandamus to compel payment by municipal judgment debtor
• affirming grant of motion to compel party to make payments in accordance with prior judgment
• constitutional debt restriction limits municipality’s ability to borrow funds or issue bonds, but not to pay judgment
• ‘‘[c]lause (6) and the first five clauses of Rule 60(b) are mutually exclusive. Relief under clause (6) is not available unless the other clauses are inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).