Skip to main content
· 10/20/1994

Powell v. Powell

Citations

  • 644 So. 2d 269
  • 1994 WL 573326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the chancery court continued to have personal jurisdiction over the defendant based on the underlying divorce proceeding, although petitions to modify custody and other “Rule 81 matters, because of their nature, require special notice”
  • holding that the chancery court continued to have personal jurisdiction over the defendant based on the underlying divorce proceeding, although petitions to modify custody and other “Rule 81 matters, because of their nature, require special notice”
  • discussion of Rule 81's applicability to contempt charges in domestic proceedings
  • discussion of Rule 81's applicability to contempt charges in domestic proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James L. Roberts, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.