Poppa v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that SSR 00-4p “requires that an ALJ must inquire about and resolve any conflicts between a [vocational expert’s] testimony regarding a job and the description of that job in the [DOT.]”
• noting that SSR 00-4p “requires that an ALJ must inquire about and resolve any conflicts between a [vocational expert’s] testimony regarding a job and the description of that job in the [DOT.]”
• finding the ALJ’s incorrect statement of a date was a “mere scrivener’s error” that did not affect the outcome of the case
• “Since the purpose of the credibility evaluation is to help the ALJ assess a claimant’s RFC, the ALJ’s credibility and RFC determinations are inherently intertwined.”
• “Since the purpose of the credibility evaluation is to help the ALJ assess a claimant's RFC, the ALJ’s credibility and RFC determinations are inherently intertwined.”
• “Since the purpose of the [symptom] evaluation is to help the ALJ access a claimant's RFC, the ALJ's [symptom evaluation] and RFC determinations are inherently intertwined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).