Hendron v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in Title II cases, the relevant period is from the alleged onset date through the date the claimant was last insured
• holding that an ALJ adequately supports his RFC determination when he thoroughly reviews the medical evidence and plaintiff’s own reports of her abilities and activities
• holding that an ALJ adequately supports his RFC determination when he thor- oughly reviews the medical evidence and plaintiff’s own reports of her abilities and activities
• holding that evidence was not significantly probative where the claimant did not explain “how that evidence undercut[] the ALJ’s conclusion that she could do a full range of sedentary work”
• holding that an ALJ adequately supports his RFC 3 Plaintiff alleges that the ALJ ignored evidence that he was seeing a psy- chologist in 2017. Doc. 8 at 31 (citing Adm. Rec. 365
• holding that when determining “whether [the claimant] was under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act,” the “[r]elevant [t]ime [p]eriod” is from the claimant’s alleged onset date though the date the claimant was last insured for disability benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).