William R. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that redetermination of RFC on remand from Appeals Council was not inconsistent with the Appeals Council’s remand order and that the remand order did not bind the ALJ to the earlier decision
• explaining that an ALJ’s decision must be supported by “such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support the conclusion”
• recognizing ALJ’s authority to make any determination not inconsistent with terms of Appeals Council remand
• explaining that an ALJ’s decision must be supported by “such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support the conclusion”
• finding no error in ALJ’s redetermination of RFC on remand, where it was not inconsistent with Appeals Council’s order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).