Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 405 N.E.2d 530
  • 273 Ind. 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that collateral estoppel does not apply to preclude the State from relying on prior felony convictions, still existing, where trial court, at previous hearing, dismissed an habitual offender count for insufficient evidence of knowing and voluntary guilty pleas
  • finding instructions similar to both those quoted above to be correct statements of the law
  • rejecting defendant’s claim that habitual offender statute was unconstitutional ex post facto law because the statute went into effect at least ten months before the defendant committed the crime for which he was convicted
  • citing, among other state cases, Burgett
  • citing, among other state cases, Burgett

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunter, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.