Skip to main content
· 9/22/1988

Poore v. State

Citations

  • 531 So. 2d 161
  • 1988 WL 97920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence which exceeds the suspended portion of a true split sentence is illegal
  • describing “a ‘probationary split sentence’ consisting of a period of confinement, none of which is suspended, followed by a period of probation” as an authorized “sentencing alternative in Florida”
  • approving as “one of five basic sentencing alternatives in Florida . . . a ‘probationary split sentence’ consisting of a period of confinement, none of which is suspended, followed by a period of probation”
  • \the cumulative incarceration imposed after violation of probation always will be subject to any limitations imposed by the sentencing guidelines recommendation\
  • “the cumulative incarceration imposed after violation of probation always will be subject to any limitations imposed by the sentencing guidelines recommendation”
  • Fla. 5th DCA Jan. 31, 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.